# Guideline 3.0 - Business: Irrationally High Pricing

**Guideline:** 3.0 · **Store:** Apple App Store · **Risk:** medium · **Difficulty:** medium · **Typical turnaround:** 1-2 days

Canonical URL: https://appstorereject.com/rejections/apple/3/guideline-30-business-irrationally-high-pricing

## Description

Apple is rejecting your app because the prices you've set for the app or its In-App Purchase products do not reflect the value of the features and content offered to the user. Apple considers charging irrationally high prices for content or services with limited value to be inappropriate for the App Store.

This rejection targets a pricing-to-value mismatch -- not the use of IAP itself (which falls under 3.1.x). Apple evaluates whether what the user receives justifies what they pay. Common triggers include weekly subscriptions priced as high as monthly competitors, consumable IAPs with extreme markup relative to the content delivered, and apps with minimal functionality charging premium prices.

Unlike most 3.x rejections which are about payment mechanics, this one is a subjective editorial judgment by the review team. Apple compares your pricing against similar apps in your category and evaluates the perceived value. This makes it harder to predict and harder to appeal, because there is no bright-line rule -- only Apple's assessment of whether the price is 'irrationally high' relative to the value delivered.

The rejection email typically lists the specific IAP items Apple considers overpriced, often by product name and storefront ID.

## Common variations

- Weekly subscription price is irrationally high relative to content offered
- In-App Purchase products do not reflect value of features
- App price does not match the limited functionality provided
- Consumable IAP pricing is excessive for the content delivered
- Multiple storefronts flagged for irrational pricing on same product

## Example rejection email

```
Guideline 3.0 - Business

Customers expect the App Store to be a safe and trusted marketplace for purchasing digital goods. Apps should never betray this trust by attempting to cheat users in any way.

Unfortunately, the prices you've selected for the app or In-App Purchase products in the app do not reflect the value of the features and content offered to the user. Charging irrationally high prices for content or services with limited value is not appropriate for the App Store.

Specifically, the prices for the following items are irrationally high:

Weekly - Multiple Storefronts - 6756762516

Next Steps:

To resolve this issue, we recommend you take the following steps:

- Revise the app or In-App Purchase products to provide more value to the user at the time of purchase.
- Choose a price for the app or In-App Purchase products that accurately reflects the value of the content and features offered.
```

## Resolution steps

## Quick Assessment
- **Risk level:** Medium
- **Resolution path:** Fix & Resubmit (adjust pricing) or Appeal (if value justifies price)
- **Typical turnaround:** 1-2 days

## The Fix

01. **Audit your pricing against competitors** — Search your App Store category for apps with similar features and content. Compare their subscription and IAP pricing to yours. If your weekly price exceeds what competitors charge monthly, that is likely the trigger.

02. **Reduce the flagged IAP prices** — Lower the prices for the specific items Apple listed in the rejection email. A good benchmark: your weekly subscription should not exceed ~25% of comparable monthly subscriptions in your category.

03. **Add value to justify the price** — If lowering prices is not viable, add features or content that justify the pricing. Document these additions clearly in your App Review notes.

04. **Restructure billing intervals** — If your weekly subscription is the issue, consider removing it entirely and offering monthly or annual plans instead. Weekly subscriptions attract the most scrutiny because the annualized cost is often dramatically higher than monthly plans.

05. **Review all storefronts** — Apple may flag pricing on specific storefronts. Ensure your pricing tiers are consistent and reasonable across all regions, accounting for local purchasing power.

06. **Write clear App Review notes** — Explain the value proposition for your pricing. Detail what the user receives: content library size, update frequency, professional features, operational costs, or licensed content.

## Prevention
- Benchmark pricing against top apps in your category before submission
- Avoid weekly subscriptions unless the content genuinely refreshes weekly
- If offering multiple billing intervals, ensure the weekly price is not dramatically higher than the monthly price on an annualized basis
- Include a clear value proposition in App Review notes for any premium-priced app

## Appeal guidance

Appeal if you can demonstrate the value proposition justifies the price -- for example, the app replaces a significantly more expensive professional tool, delivers licensed premium content, or provides a specialized service with real operational costs. Include competitor pricing comparisons and a clear breakdown of what the user receives. However, if your pricing is genuinely out of line with comparable apps, lowering the price and resubmitting is faster than appealing.

## Before / after examples

**Before:** Weekly subscription priced at $19.99/week ($1,039/year annualized) for a simple habit tracker with no premium content or data services
**After:** Restructured to $4.99/month or $29.99/year, with weekly plan removed. Added detailed App Review notes explaining features included at each tier
**Why it works:** Apple flags pricing when the annualized cost of short-interval subscriptions dramatically exceeds the value delivered. Removing the weekly tier and offering reasonable monthly/annual plans resolves the mismatch.

**Before:** Consumable IAP: 10 credits for $49.99 in a wallpaper app with ~200 wallpapers total
**After:** Consumable IAP: 10 credits for $4.99, plus a $9.99/month unlimited access subscription. App Review notes detail the AI generation pipeline cost per wallpaper
**Why it works:** When consumable pricing is extreme relative to content volume, restructuring to a subscription with unlimited access at a reasonable price demonstrates fair value.

## Common questions

**Can you appeal a 3.0 rejection?**

Appeal if you can demonstrate the value proposition justifies the price -- for example, the app replaces a significantly more expensive professional tool, delivers licensed premium content, or provides a specialized service with real operational costs. Include competitor pricing comparisons and a clear breakdown of what the user receives. However, if your pricing is genuinely out of line with comparable apps, lowering the price and resubmitting is faster than appealing.

**How long does this typically take to fix?**

Typical turnaround is 1-2 days (difficulty: medium). After resubmission, most re-reviews complete within 24-48 hours.

---
*Machine-readable source: https://api.appstorereject.com/api/rejections/detail?slug=guideline-30-business-irrationally-high-pricing*