Guideline 1.1.1
Guideline 1.1.1 - Safety: Defamatory or Discriminatory Content
Our Take
Apple is rejecting your app because it contains content they consider defamatory, discriminatory, or mean-spirited toward a targeted group. This covers references or commentary about religion, race, sexual orientation, gender, national/ethnic origin, or other protected groups — particularly if the app could humiliate, intimidate, or harm individuals. This rejection often catches developers off guard because the problematic content may be user-generated, sourced from a third-party API, or intended as satire. Apple does exempt professional political satirists and humorists, but the bar for that exemption is high — your app needs to clearly be a satire/humor platform, not an app that happens to contain offensive content. The root cause is usually one of: (1) unmoderated user-generated content that includes slurs or hate speech, (2) app-provided content or imagery that stereotypes or targets a group, or (3) a content feed from an external source that hasn't been filtered. Apple reviewers may flag this even if the content isn't prominently displayed — a single screen or buried section can trigger this rejection.
Resolution Guide
Identify the specific content
Ask Apple via the Resolution Center what specific content triggered the rejection. If they don't specify, audit all text, images, and user-generated content for anything targeting protected groups.
Remove or moderate the content
If it's app-provided content, remove it. If it's user-generated, implement content filtering and moderation to prevent it from appearing.
Add content moderation infrastructure
If your app has any UGC component, implement keyword filtering, a reporting mechanism, and human or AI moderation review.
Review third-party content sources
If your app pulls content from APIs or feeds, add a filtering layer to catch discriminatory content before it reaches users.
Document your moderation approach
In the Review Notes, explain what content was removed and what moderation systems are now in place.
Prevention
Example Rejection Email
Consider Appealing
Only appeal if the content is clearly satirical from a professional satire/humor platform, or if the reviewer misidentified the content. If the flagged content is user-generated, the fix is moderation — not an appeal.
Before & After
App displays unmoderated user comments including slurs and hate speech targeting ethnic groups
App implements keyword filtering, user reporting, and human moderation queue — offensive content is removed within 24 hours
What changed: Apple requires active content moderation, not just reactive removal after complaints.
Community Solutions · 0
Sign in to share your solution.
More Guideline 1 (Safety) rejections
- Guideline 1.1 - Safety: Objectionable Content in App Marketing
- Guideline 1.1.2 - Safety: Realistic Violence or Encouragement of Violence
- Guideline 1.1.3 - Safety: Weapons and Firearms Content
- Guideline 1.1.4 - Safety: Sexual or Pornographic Content
- Guideline 1.1.6 - Safety: False Information or Fake Features
- Guideline 1.1.7 - Safety: Exploiting Recent Events or Tragedies