Guideline 3.1.3
Guideline 3.1.3(a) - Reader Apps: Incorrectly Claiming Reader App Status
Our Take
Apple is rejecting your app because it claims to be a 'reader' app to justify not using In-App Purchase for content access, but it does not qualify under Apple's reader app definition. Reader apps are a specific exception that allows apps providing access to previously purchased content -- such as magazines, newspapers, books, audio, music, and video -- to not offer IAP as a purchase mechanism within the app. To qualify as a reader app, the app must: (1) provide access to content that users have already purchased or subscribed to outside the app, (2) not offer in-app purchasing for that content, (3) fall within the defined content categories (magazines, newspapers, books, audio, music, video), and (4) be approved through Apple's reader app entitlement process. Common disqualifications: SaaS tools claiming reader status because users 'read' their data, productivity apps claiming reader status for document access, educational platforms claiming reader status for course content, and apps that create or produce content (not just consume it). The reader app exception is narrow and content-consumption focused.
Resolution Guide
Apply for the reader app entitlement
Contact Apple through the developer portal to request reader app classification. Provide documentation of your content catalog and external purchase mechanism.
Ensure compliance with reader app rules
No in-app purchase buttons, no links to external purchase pages within the app (unless you have the External Purchase Link entitlement), no calls to action directing users to buy content.
Document your case
In Review Notes, explain what content categories you serve, how users purchase content externally, and how the app provides consumption-only access.
### If you are NOT a legitimate reader app:
Implement IAP
Add StoreKit In-App Purchase for all digital content and features accessed within the app.
Remove reader app claims
Remove any references to reader app status from your app metadata and Review Notes.
Consider hybrid approach
You can offer IAP within the app while also honoring purchases made on your website through account-based entitlements.
Prevention
Example Rejection Email
Consider Appealing
Appeal if your app genuinely provides access to previously purchased content in qualifying categories and the reviewer may have misunderstood the app's function. Provide detailed documentation of how users purchase content externally and how the app provides read-only access. Otherwise, implement IAP.
Before & After
Project management SaaS app claims reader app status because users 'read' their project boards and documents, avoiding IAP for premium tier access
App implements IAP for premium tier; users can also access premium features via their web subscription through account authentication, but IAP is offered as a purchase option within the app
What changed: Reader apps are limited to specific content consumption categories. SaaS and productivity tools do not qualify.
Community Solutions · 0
Sign in to share your solution.
More Guideline 3 (Business) rejections
- Guideline 3.0 - Business: Irrationally High Pricing
- Guideline 3.1.1 - In-App Purchase: Expiring Virtual Currency
- Guideline 3.1.1 - In-App Purchase: External Link for Digital Content in Reader App Without Entitlement
- Guideline 3.1.1 - In-App Purchase: License Key or Serial Number Unlocks
- Guideline 3.1.1 - In-App Purchase: Loot Boxes Without Disclosed Odds
- Guideline 3.1.1 - In-App Purchase: Missing Restore Purchases Button